AllianceBern 2005 Retirement Strat I (LTBIX)
Expense Ratio: 0.62%
Expected Lifetime Fees: $19,207.62
The AllianceBern 2005 Retirement Strat I fund (LTBIX) is a Target Date 2000-2010 fund started on 09/1/2005 and has $25.80 million in assets under management. The current manager has been running AllianceBern 2005 Retirement Strat I since 09/23/2005. The fund is rated by Morningstar. This fund does not charge 12b-1 fees.
iShares S&P Target Date 2010 (TZD)
Expense Ratio: 0.11%
Expected Lifetime Fees: $3,595.26
The iShares S&P Target Date 2010 (TZD) is an Exchange Traded Fund. It is a "basket" of securities that index the Target Date 2000-2010 investment strategy and is an alternative to a Target Date 2000-2010 mutual fund. Fees are very low compared to a comparable mutual fund like AllianceBern 2005 Retirement Strat I because computers automatically manage the stocks.
|Mutual Fund Name||Ticker Symbol||Turnover||Assets (M)||Annual Fees|
|American Funds Trgt Date Ret 2010 R5||REATX||19.0%||937||0.43%|
|American Funds Trgt Date Ret 2010 R6||RFTTX||19.0%||937||0.38%|
|Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2005 I||FFIVX||28.0%||264||0.56%|
|Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2010 I||FCIFX||25.0%||848||0.61%|
|T. Rowe Price Retirement 2005||TRRFX||17.5%||1,200||0.58%|
|T. Rowe Price Retirement 2010||TRRAX||19.0%||5,500||0.61%|
|Vanguard Target Retirement 2010 Inv||VTENX||27.0%||5,600||0.17%|
|Wells Fargo Advantage DJ Target 2010 I||WFOAX||43.0%||852||0.48%|
Turnover represents how much of a mutual fund's holdings are changed over the course of a year through buying and selling. Active mutual funds have an average turnover rate of about 85%, meaning that funds are turning over nearly all of their holdings every year. A high turnover means you could make lower returns because: 1) buying and selling stocks costs money through commissions and spreads and 2) the fund will distribute yearly capital gains which increases your taxes. Look for funds with turnover rates below 50%. For comparison, ETF turnover rates average around 10% or lower.
Generally, smaller funds do better than larger ones. The more assets in a mutual fund, the lower the chance that it will beat its index. Managers outperform an index by choosing stocks that are undervalued. In order to find these undervalued stocks, the manager has to know more than his competitors to develop an "edge." There are only a finite number of stocks a mutual fund manager can reasonably analyze and actively track to gain such a competitive edge. When the fund has more assets, the manager must analyze large companies because he needs to take larger positions. Large companies are more efficiently priced in the market and it becomes increasingly difficult to get an edge.