{"id":82,"date":"2008-03-06T02:39:21","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T10:39:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/marketriders\/weblog\/?p=82"},"modified":"2017-03-09T17:18:52","modified_gmt":"2017-03-10T01:18:52","slug":"barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/","title":{"rendered":"Barron&#039;s Online &#8211; 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"MsoNormal\"><cite>by Karen Hube<\/cite><em><br \/>\n<cite>Monday, March 17, 2008<\/cite><\/em><\/p>\n<p>These are scary times for investors trying to shore up their retirement<br \/>\nportfolios. Stocks&#8217; values are down, inflation is ticking up and home prices<br \/>\nare sliding. But as investors nervously eye all that, they may be overlooking<br \/>\nthe biggest threat of all: themselves.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;How you react to negative news about the markets can do far more<br \/>\ndamage to your retirement portfolio than temporary trends in the market,&#8221;<br \/>\nsays Mark Cortazzo, an investment adviser at Macro Consulting Group in<br \/>\nParsippany, N.J. &#8220;Investors can truly be their own worst enemies.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>While investors are prone to making mistakes no matter which direction the<br \/>\nmarket is headed, when stocks lose value &#8212; as they have for four consecutive<br \/>\nmonths &#8212; investor errors can have more exaggerated effects on wealth, Cortazzo<br \/>\nsays.<\/p>\n<p>So how much damage does the average investor inflict upon himself in real<br \/>\nnumbers?<\/p>\n<p>At the request of <em>Barron&#8217;s<\/em>, Christopher Cordaro, an investment<br \/>\nadviser in Chatham, N.J., with Regent Atlantic Capital, ran some<br \/>\ncalculations to answer this question, and the answer isn&#8217;t pretty.<\/p>\n<p>Bottom line: Simply by making three of the most common errors &#8212; failing to<br \/>\ndiversify wisely, trying to time the market and overpaying on investment<br \/>\nexpenses &#8212; you would have missed out on $375,000 of gains on a $1 million<br \/>\nportfolio invested for the 10 years through January 2008.<\/p>\n<p>Cordaro found that a wisely constructed portfolio free of investor error<br \/>\nwould have returned an average annual 6.86% during that period and grown to<br \/>\nabout $1,942,000. But factor in the three errors, and the return shrinks to<br \/>\n4.59%, while the ending account balance drops to about $1,567,000. In general,<br \/>\nthe smart portfolio was broadly diversified in terms of both <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">asset class<\/span><\/span> and country. It made no attempts to call tops and bottoms in the market, and it<br \/>\nsteered clear of pointless but all-too-common fees.<\/p>\n<p>The worst part, Cordaro says, is that investors often don&#8217;t even realize<br \/>\nthey&#8217;re sabotaging their nest eggs &#8212; because the slippage in return isn&#8217;t<br \/>\nsudden or drastic. &#8220;It&#8217;s small enough that they don&#8217;t notice it, but it is<br \/>\nslowly eating away at their financial independence like a cancer,&#8221; he<br \/>\nsays.<\/p>\n<p>The good news? If you know what to look for, chances are you&#8217;ll be able to<br \/>\navert disaster. Here is a rundown on the three most common and costliest<br \/>\nmistakes that investors make with their nest eggs.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Neglecting <\/strong><span class=\"yshortcuts\"><strong>Asset Allocation<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Practically all investors would agree that they want the best returns and<br \/>\nthe lowest possible risk. But when it comes to setting up a portfolio to<br \/>\ndeliver on that promise, many investors don&#8217;t go the distance &#8212; and they pay<br \/>\ndearly for it.<\/p>\n<p>The best way for an average investor to achieve the highest risk-adjusted<br \/>\nrewards is to allocate investments broadly across different asset classes. Yet<br \/>\nfew investors do so: According to a 2007 survey of <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">401(k)<\/span><\/span> assets by the <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">Profit<br \/>\nSharing<\/span><\/span> and 401(k) Council of America, the average investor holds<br \/>\nsome 25% of 401(k) assets in his own company stock. Beyond that, at least a<br \/>\nthird of assets are in domestic stocks. Less than 8% of retirement-plan assets<br \/>\nare in non-U.S. stocks, and fewer than 1% are in real estate.<\/p>\n<p>In Cordaro&#8217;s example, you can see how an investor can buff up a return by<br \/>\nrefining his asset allocation. A simple allocation of 60% in large U.S. growth and<br \/>\nvalue stocks and 40% in intermediate bonds would have delivered a 5.2% average<br \/>\nannual return in the 10-year period ending January 2008. Add a sprinkling of<br \/>\nsmall U.S.<br \/>\ngrowth and value stocks, and large foreign stocks, and you boost your return to<br \/>\n5.7%. Better yet, add some world bonds, emerging markets and real estate, and<br \/>\nthe return plumps up to 6.4%.<\/p>\n<p>That latter portfolio, Cordaro says, was invested 30% in large U.S. growth<br \/>\nand value stocks, 10% in small U.S. growth and value stocks, 10% in large<br \/>\nforeign growth and value stocks, 5% in emerging markets, 35% in intermediate<br \/>\nbonds, 5% in world bonds and 5% in real estate.<\/p>\n<p>Juggling a number of asset classes isn&#8217;t always easy. Jay Berger, a partner<br \/>\nat Independent Wealth Management in <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">Traverse City<\/span><span class=\"yshortcuts\">, Mich<\/span>.<\/span>, said that in 2006,<br \/>\nclients panicked over the Pimco Commodity Real Return Fund&#8217;s 3% decline.<br \/>\n&#8220;We explained that we need a portfolio with assets moving in different<br \/>\ndirections. The best analogy is: Look at it as a perennial garden.   <a style='color: inherit !important;' HREF='' TITLE=''><\/a>  If<br \/>\neverything is in bloom at the same time, that probably means everything will<br \/>\nwilt at the same time.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Timing the Market<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Investors have such a dismal record of being able to time the market that<br \/>\nmutual-fund inflows and outflows appear to be contrary indicators of which way<br \/>\nthe market is heading, says Meir Statman, a finance professor at <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">Santa Clara<\/span><span class=\"yshortcuts\"> University<\/span><\/span> in <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">California<\/span><\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not the perfect-idiot forecast,&#8221; he says, but it&#8217;s close.<br \/>\nIdeally, of course, you would want to sell your holdings when prices are high<br \/>\nand poised to drop, and buy stocks on sale, right before a run-up in values.<\/p>\n<p>But over the past decade, investors have done the exact opposite. The month<br \/>\nwith the biggest-ever net inflows of assets into stock mutual funds occurred in<br \/>\nFebruary of 2000, &#8220;which was the doorstep of one of the worst declines in<br \/>\nhistory,&#8221; says Ernie Ankrim, <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">chief investment strategist<\/span><\/span> at Russell Investments. The biggest outflows were also poorly timed: Some of<br \/>\nthe biggest occurred in the months leading up to October 2002, when the market<br \/>\nhit bottom.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This kind of behavior of getting excited after good news and scared<br \/>\nafter bad news causes investors to give up between 2.5 and three percentage<br \/>\npoints a year,&#8221; Ankrim says. &#8220;The whole reason investors put up with<br \/>\nthe volatility of stocks is to gain about three or four percentage points over<br \/>\nbonds &#8212; if we give most of that back, that means we&#8217;re accepting all of the<br \/>\nvolatility of the stock market for no good reason.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the 10-year period of Cordaro&#8217;s example, investors suffered more modestly<br \/>\nthan Ankrim&#8217;s estimates, but losses were still significant. Using actual<br \/>\nmutual-fund flows over 10 years ending January 2008, Cordaro found that <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">market<br \/>\ntiming<\/span><\/span> cost the average investor a half percentage point of<br \/>\nreturn each year. On his $1 million portfolio, that means missing out on<br \/>\n$93,000 in gains.<\/p>\n<p>You don&#8217;t need to be near a long-term market top or bottom to do serious<br \/>\ndamage. From 1980 through 2006, investors who missed out on just the five<br \/>\nbest-performing days in the <span style=\"cursor: pointer; -moz-background-clip: -moz-initial; -moz-background-origin: -moz-initial; -moz-background-inline-policy: -moz-initial; background-attachment: scroll;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">Standard &amp; Poor&#8217;s 500<br \/>\nindex<\/span><\/span> would have ended up with 26% less than someone fully<br \/>\ninvested in the index during that period, says Carolyn Clancy, executive vice<br \/>\npresident of Personal Investments, a division of <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">Fidelity Investments<\/span><\/span>.<br \/>\n&#8220;Missing just 30 of the best-performing days would have reduced the value<br \/>\nby 73%,&#8221; she adds.<\/p>\n<p>Another kind of market timing is more passive, yet still destructive: It is<br \/>\nsimply to stop feeding more money into your investments in rockier times.<\/p>\n<p>Consider this: According to a 2007 study by Dalbar&#8217;s, a mutual-fund research<br \/>\nfirm, if you had invested $10,000 in the S&amp;P 500 index over 20 years<br \/>\nthrough December 2006 in a sporadic pattern that matches actual behavior of <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">mutual-fund<br \/>\ninvestors<\/span><\/span> during that period, you would have ended up with a<br \/>\ntotal of $33,252.<\/p>\n<p>If, however, you had systematically invested the $10,000 in equal increments<br \/>\nover 20 years &#8212; through good times and bad-you would have ended up with<br \/>\n$42,877. The study found that even if you chose a fund that captured only 75%<br \/>\nof the <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">S&amp;P 500<\/span><\/span>&#8216;s return, by <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">dollar-cost averaging<\/span><\/span> you would still end up with more than if you had sporadically invested in the<br \/>\nS&amp;P 500 fund.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Paying Too Much<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Before you win cocktail-bragging rights for earning a robust return on an<br \/>\ninvestment, be sure to factor in how much you paid for your winnings through<br \/>\nexpenses and fees.<\/p>\n<p>While more investors than ever before are seeking out low-cost mutual funds,<br \/>\nthere are still investors who believe that they need to pay higher expenses for<br \/>\nbetter performance, says Mercer Bullard, a securities-law professor at the <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">University<\/span><span class=\"yshortcuts\"> of Mississippi<\/span><\/span>.<br \/>\nBut, he adds, there is no evidence to support that. Higher fees simply do not<br \/>\nindicate better management.<\/p>\n<p>Consider <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">S&amp;P 500 index funds<\/span><\/span>. While the performance<br \/>\nof these funds is practically identical, given that they mirror the same index,<br \/>\nexpenses are all over the map &#8212; some funds charge no load, some have no load<br \/>\nbut do have a so-called <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">12b-1 fee<\/span><\/span>, which is an operating expense, and<br \/>\nyet others have both a load and a 12b-1 fee.<\/p>\n<p>A 2006 study by Zero Alpha Group, a network of advisory firms, and Fund<br \/>\nDemocracy, a shareholder-advocacy group, looked at how much investors would pay<br \/>\nin fees if they invested $10,000 in these funds for 20 years and earned an<br \/>\naverage annual 10% gain. It found that the average investor would have paid $2,582<br \/>\nin fees in the lowest-cost fund; $3,744 in the fund with only a 12b-1 fee, and<br \/>\n$7,600 in the <span style=\"cursor: pointer;\"><span class=\"yshortcuts\">load fund<\/span><\/span> with the 12b-1 fee.<\/p>\n<p>In Cordaro&#8217;s hypothetical $1 million portfolio invested 10 years ago, he<br \/>\nlooked at the impact that half a percentage point in fees can make on a<br \/>\nportfolio. While his best-case portfolio earned an average annual return of<br \/>\n6.86%, he found that if higher fees knocked half a percentage point off of<br \/>\nreturns, an investor would have ended up with $1,848,865 rather than<br \/>\n$1,941,837.<\/p>\n<p>Taken altogether, Cordaro says, the impact of investor error &#8212; even<br \/>\nseemingly small ones &#8212; can be grievous over the long term. &#8220;We&#8217;re talking<br \/>\nabout the difference in being able to retire in comfort or having to work many<br \/>\nmore years to meet your goals.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"MsoNormal\">\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Karen Hube Monday, March 17, 2008 These are scary times for investors trying to shore up their retirement portfolios. Stocks&#8217; values are down, inflation is ticking up and home &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/\">Read more <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_wp_rev_ctl_limit":""},"categories":[6,16],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.6.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"by Karen Hube Monday, March 17, 2008 These are scary times for investors trying to shore up their retirement portfolios. Stocks&#8217; values are down, inflation is ticking up and home &hellip; Read more &rarr;\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@marketriders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@marketriders\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"MarketRiders\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/\",\"name\":\"Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-06T10:39:21+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-10T01:18:52+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/f2be262f5c0f3ed5ad50d6c40640ba8c\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Barron&#039;s Online &#8211; 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/\",\"name\":\"MarketRiders.com\",\"description\":\"How To Become A Better Investor\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/f2be262f5c0f3ed5ad50d6c40640ba8c\",\"name\":\"MarketRiders\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e06113f594828daaf313d283544d566?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e06113f594828daaf313d283544d566?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"MarketRiders\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/author\/support\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders","twitter_description":"by Karen Hube Monday, March 17, 2008 These are scary times for investors trying to shore up their retirement portfolios. Stocks&#8217; values are down, inflation is ticking up and home &hellip; Read more &rarr;","twitter_creator":"@marketriders","twitter_site":"@marketriders","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"MarketRiders","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/","url":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/","name":"Barron&#039;s Online - 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs | MarketRiders","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-06T10:39:21+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-10T01:18:52+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/f2be262f5c0f3ed5ad50d6c40640ba8c"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/barrons-online-3-ways-investors-ruin-their-nesteggs\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Barron&#039;s Online &#8211; 3 Ways Investors Ruin Their Nesteggs"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/","name":"MarketRiders.com","description":"How To Become A Better Investor","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/f2be262f5c0f3ed5ad50d6c40640ba8c","name":"MarketRiders","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e06113f594828daaf313d283544d566?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/8e06113f594828daaf313d283544d566?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"MarketRiders"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.marketriders.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/author\/support\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=82"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11510,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/82\/revisions\/11510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=82"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=82"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.marketriders.com\/investing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=82"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}