What’s the difference between gambling and investing? Let’s stop by the race track and figure it out.
One of the most entertaining aspects of any specialized endeavor, investing included, is the jargon one acquires. Gambling is a pastime, perhaps a sport (if televised poker matches are any indication), but definitely it is above all a social group with its own peculiar turns of phrase.
If all you know about horse racing you learned from the occasional Hollywood movie, you probably haven’t heard the colorful ways that gamblers talk about their wagers. Here are a few fun words to know, related to the order in which horses finish the race:
What does this have to do with investing? In the popular mind, unfortunately, there is no difference between gambling and investing. Breathless cable TV coverage of the markets certainly reinforces this idea.
But there is a difference between gambling and investing, or at least effective investing. The methodical investor expects a return at minimal risk, not a wild, all-in bet for entertainment’s sake. That’s why people buy and hold trillions in government and corporate bonds: They expect to get paid for the use of their cash.
Still, there are some instructive parallels in thinking about the difference between gambling and investing. You can think of investing in common stocks, particularly concentrated bets on single stocks or sectors, as a kind of win-place-show wager. You are taking the position that the price of that stock will appreciate faster than the rest of the market and all bonds. It will “win,” or at least beat the pack.
Mutual funds can be considered a form of exotic wagering. Here, you believe you have backed the right horse (the investing style) and the right jockey (the manager) on the right day (whatever is happening in the larger economy). It feels good to make a commitment to a winning team, but the risk is still quite large, considering the high chance of finishing “out of the money,” that is, so far back in the pack it wasn’t worth the fees you paid.
Interestingly, you can take the boxed bet, too. That’s one way to think of index funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs). You are betting that all of the horses will run fast and all will finish well. Some will lose the race, but the average speed of the pack will be impressive nonetheless.
Naturally, in horse racing, the safer bet pays an accordingly lower jackpot. And taking so many combinations of bets will cost you so much that the potential return is swamped.
And that is the major difference between gambling and investing. With passive index funds and ETFs, the opposite occurs: The cost of taking a relatively “safe” position falls, partly because the funds are on autopilot (no jockey) and because the horses don’t have to win, just finish well. Even if one horse stumbles (bankruptcy of a company), the pack moves on. The difference between gambling and investing is mostly risk reduction.
Investing in a broad benchmark is “style free,” so the risk of dramatic underperformance is zero. It’s not as safe as owning, say, a bond, but with bonds-only portfolios there are other risks, such as rising inflation and higher interest rates. It takes a mix of assets to build a great “boxed bet” when investing. That’s asset allocation.
With good asset allocation and rebalancing, you don’t even have to be at the track on the right day, because you are there all day, every day, collecting wins when they come in and then rolling those winning bets back into the field. And that’s a huge difference between gambling and investing.
Lipper, the stock market research firm, had new data out recently (via Reuters) about where people are “placing their bets” these days. Turns out, they like being in the market. It’s just that their interest in narrow, win-only bets seems to have diminished:
Despite a 2.5% climb in the S&P 500 index in the week ended September 12, investors pulled $1.3 billion out of equity mutual funds – the fifth week in a row during which these funds experienced net outflows. On the other hand, investors appeared to rediscover their enthusiasm for equity exchange-traded funds (ETFs), adding $12.1 billion to those products, with the biggest beneficiaries being large index ETFs like the SPY.
Investors in general appear to be headed toward a “boxed bet” investing thesis which, given the market’s recent gyrations, is unsurprising. Why take on the risk of betting wrong and blowing away your retirement when it’s simpler, easier, and cheaper to put your money on the entire field?