<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MarketRiders Blog &#187; Vanguard Funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.marketriders.com/blog/category/etfs-index-funds/vanguard-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog</link>
	<description>Asset Allocation, Retirement Investing, ETFs, Vanguard Index Funds, Investment Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 20:46:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Do Your Homework To Understand Mutual Funds and Their Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/do-your-homework-to-understand-mutual-funds-and-their-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/do-your-homework-to-understand-mutual-funds-and-their-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About ETFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial & Retirement Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Funds Versus Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of Compound Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanguard Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketriders.com/blog/?p=520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court finally examined the problem with mutual funds with regards to their fees. The result &#8211; not much protection for the average retirement investor. The Court decided to rule against further legislation and to keep the onus of fee due diligence on investors. You can imagine that the $11 trillion mutual fund industry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court finally examined the problem with mutual funds with regards to their fees. The result &#8211; not much protection for the average retirement investor. The Court decided to rule against further legislation and to keep the onus of fee due diligence on investors. You can imagine that the $11 trillion mutual fund industry that collects a whopping $90 billion in annual fees rejoiced.  To read more about this, read Reuters&#8217; article <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62T2UT20100330">Supreme Court hands victory to mutual fund industry</a>.</p>
<p>So when it comes to investing in any type of fund, be it index mutual funds, exchange traded funds (ETFs) or mutual funds, investors need to be their own advocate.  Do your homework to understand your true costs as no two funds are exactly alike.  &#8217;Americans save trillions of dollars for college education and retirement by investing it with funds managed by industry and giants like the Vanguard Group and Fidelity Investments.&#8217;</p>
<p>If you are new to the game, beginners should brush up on Investing 101 basics.  There are a lot of choices.  Make the smartest choice for YOU.  Just remember, time is your friend.  Money spent on fees today, compounded over time, is money that could be sitting in your retirement account. Do your homework, you will thank yourself later!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/do-your-homework-to-understand-mutual-funds-and-their-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Wall Street Works And How To Protect Yourself</title>
		<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/how-wall-street-works-and-how-to-protect-yourself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/how-wall-street-works-and-how-to-protect-yourself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DFA (Dimensional Fund Advisors)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Wall Street Makes Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanguard Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketriders.com/blog/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of this week&#8217;s articles Wall Street Journal writer Jason Zweig, reports that an investor, Philip Eberlin reportedly put 80% of his assets in CDs and fixed annuities because:  &#8220;I don&#8217;t have trust in Wall Street to help the small investor in any way, shape or form.&#8221;
Who or what is this bad, ugly beast [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of this week&#8217;s articles Wall Street Journal writer Jason Zweig, reports that an investor, Philip Eberlin reportedly put 80% of his assets in CDs and fixed annuities because:  &#8220;I don&#8217;t have trust in Wall Street to help the small investor in any way, shape or form.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who or what is this bad, ugly beast called &#8220;Wall Street?&#8221;  Does anyone really know how Wall Street works?  When we blame it for all financial woes, who are we blaming?  Goldman Sachs?  Warren Buffett (he owns alot of Goldman)?   Is Wall Street your life insurance company, credit card companies, mutual funds, brokers, banks, and investment banks?  All or some?</p>
<p>The fact is, none of us are sure and it doesn&#8217;t matter because we don&#8217;t have much power over this ominous Wall Street &#8212; whatever it is.  But there is a Wall Street that we, as individuals can prevent from damaging us.</p>
<p>Most financial institutions want to control our money, which in turn, gives them a unique opportunity to bill us through fees that we don&#8217;t see or worse, don&#8217;t understand.  Because we&#8217;re not writing checks for these fees, we tend not to pay attention as our money flows out of our pockets and into theirs.  And that&#8217;s where the trouble starts!</p>
<p>Put $25,000 into a mutual fund and you&#8217;re hiring a Wall Street stock picker and paying him around $400 per year.  He and his fund now control your money.  Hire a financial adviser or a broker to manage your account &#8211; there you go again!  Wall Street now controls your money.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s where Mr. Eberlin has it wrong &#8212; its investing 101.  If I buy an ETF of 1500 US companies, I own a part of all of them &#8211; IBM, Coke, Disney and Microsoft.  There&#8217;s no Wall Street.  A broker may hold my security, but they&#8217;re not charging me to invest.  I own great businesses, and my distrust of Wall Street should have no bearing on my decision to do so.</p>
<p>Buying low cost ETFs according to a prudent asset allocation, takes Wall Street&#8217;s hand out of your pocket.  You&#8217;re in control of your own money.</p>
<p>Our friend <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/free-etf-trades-are-big-draw-for-investors-2010-02-07?reflink=MW_news_stmp">John Spence writes</a> about this remarkable breakthrough.  When you trade Schwab ETFs or now iShares ETFs at Fidelity &#8211; you pay no commissions.  This lowers the cost of implementing an all ETF portfolio that is periodically rebalanced.  Schwab and Fidelity will also manage your ETF portfolio for you for about .6%.  While not as good as our service and way more expensive, it validates our approach and educates investors.  Go Schwab and Fidelity!</p>
<p>Responsible journalists like <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/funds/2010-02-12-etfs12_CV_N.htm">John Waggoner of USA Today</a> are helping investors learn which ETFs to stay away from. He has a great style for helping beginner investors understand risk and financial information.  He gives a balanced view of ETFs and how to know which ones to stay away from.  We were quoted in this article, so we&#8217;re biased</p>
<p>Jason Zweig, is one of the most respected finance journalists in America.  In <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704878904575031442147996562.html">this article</a>, he posits:  &#8220;For many investors, the market&#8217;s turbulence hasn&#8217;t just destroyed wealth. It has shattered their faith in the financial system itself.&#8221;</p>
<p>In the coming years, these trends will reduce Wall Street&#8217;s fees which will in turn, weaken its grip over Americans and their money.   We hope you&#8217;re riding these trends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/how-wall-street-works-and-how-to-protect-yourself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;24&#8242; Star Kiefer Sutherland Blows Up His Retirement Portfolio</title>
		<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/24-star-kiefer-sutherland-blows-up-his-retirement-portfolio/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/24-star-kiefer-sutherland-blows-up-his-retirement-portfolio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mitch</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial & Retirement Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malfeasance And Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanguard Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketriders.com/blog/?p=399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The news about retirement portfolio investing this week has been a little light, so we start with the lighter side.  Kiefer Sutherland&#8217;s misfortune is not funny, but we&#8217;ve watched our hero in &#8220;24&#8243; defy the odds of multiple life and death situations.  So it&#8217;s ironic that in real life, he too fell victim to an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news about retirement portfolio investing this week has been a little light, so we start with the lighter side.  Kiefer Sutherland&#8217;s misfortune is not funny, but we&#8217;ve watched our hero in &#8220;24&#8243; defy the odds of multiple life and death situations.  So it&#8217;s ironic that in real life, he too <a href="http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7017641974">fell victim to an investment scam</a>.  &#8220;24&#8243; main man Kiefer Sutherland has lost $869,000 in a rip-off investment scheme. The 43-year-old actor is just one of several victims of Michael Wayne Carr, who enticed investors to fork out cash for a cattle deal that turns out to be a fraud.  It happens all the time, no matter how rich and famous you are and when you can have the smartest advisors money can buy.  Note to Kiefer and the producers of 24: for Day 9 (next year&#8217;s season), replace the terrorists with financial terrorists.  Kiefer&#8217;s acting will be supercharged from personal experience!</p>
<p>Second, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/22/business/AP-US-Investing-ETF-Push.html?_r=1&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=etfs:%20%20the%20next%20step&amp;st=cse">according to the NY Times,</a> if you want to be considered &#8220;in the know&#8221;, just start talking about ETFs at your next party.  The wave is sweeping the investment landscape and investing in them might soon be considered &#8220;cool.&#8221;  &#8221;Average investors haven&#8217;t really latched onto perhaps the biggest investing innovation of the past two decades.  Despite being low-cost, tax-efficient and easy to buy or sell at a moment&#8217;s notice, exchange-traded funds remain largely the domain of institutional investors and stock-market aficionados.  &#8216;Main Street still barely knows what they are,&#8217; acknowledges ETF expert Matt Hougan of IndexUniverse, an independent Web site on exchange-traded and other index funds. That may soon change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Third, one of our Experts at MarketRiders is <a href="http://rs6.net/tn.jsp?et=1102974633445&amp;s=286&amp;e=001Q3dna0HI78S4v60YAc6nFlxTYXqZIhyeNdzbvj4M7hKzHlEW3fStL82pBat8EmECFRhC02JV55VmvGocIuxv_zwsA779pIhJM5pxlkjTWQDQvVDZYUYaLsCExfBR3Z-5">John Bogle</a>, the founder of Vanguard.  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703436504574640523013840290.html#printMode">When he writes</a> in the Wall Street Journal, we listen.  There&#8217;s a group of investors so enamored with him, that they host a popular and growing website dedicated to following his investment theories: www.bogleheads.org. Jane Bryant Quinn lists this site as her favorite. Bogle&#8217;s editorial is well worth reading.  He writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;(At the end of 2009) I concluded that &#8216;the faith of investors has been betrayed.&#8217; How so? Because the returns generated by our corporate stewards have often been illusory, created by so-called financial engineering and produced only by the assumption of massive risks. What&#8217;s more, too many of our professional money managers have failed to act as vigilant stewards of the money that we investors entrusted to them.&#8221;</p>
<p>We can&#8217;t emphasize it enough &#8212; maintain an asset allocation that&#8217;s good for you so that you have diversification, and own ETFs in each asset class.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/24-star-kiefer-sutherland-blows-up-his-retirement-portfolio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Index Funds: Not So Bad Of a Decade For Vanguard Funds</title>
		<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/index-funds-not-so-bad-of-a-decade-for-vanguard-funds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/index-funds-not-so-bad-of-a-decade-for-vanguard-funds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sally</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vanguard Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.marketriders.com/blog/?p=301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These last two weeks I have read many articles and blogs that reference the last decade as being disastrous for most investors, yet was pleased to read how owners of Vanguard Funds, particularly Vanguard Index Funds, fared quite well.  Rick Ferri of Portfolio Solutions recently showed in a Forbes article &#8220;A Decent Decade for Index Investors&#8221;  the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These last two weeks I have read many articles and blogs that reference the last decade as being disastrous for most investors, yet was pleased to read how owners of Vanguard Funds, particularly Vanguard Index Funds, fared quite well.  Rick Ferri of Portfolio Solutions recently showed in a Forbes article &#8220;<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/05/stocks-bonds-not-bad-decade-personal-finance-indexer-ferri.html?partner=artctrlinboxmain">A Decent Decade for Index Investors</a>&#8221;  the 10-year results from different Vanguard index funds that have been around the entire decade.  Pretty impressive. Vanguard, the pioneer of index funds and provider of Vanguard Mutual Funds and ETFs provides funds with a relatively low cost structure, which compounded over time can positively impact one&#8217;s bottom line.  You pick the best Vanguard fund for your asset allocation and hopefully you too will find financial reward;  research indicates that &#8220;Index fund investors who remained disciplined and stuck to a simple strategy of diversification and rebalancing fared pretty well.&#8221;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-family: Verdana; font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/index-funds-not-so-bad-of-a-decade-for-vanguard-funds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tracking 9 ETF Portfolios &#8211; Surprise Winners and Losers So Far in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/tracking-9-etf-portfolios-surprise-winners-and-losers-so-far-in-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/tracking-9-etf-portfolios-surprise-winners-and-losers-so-far-in-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About ETFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Active Versus Passive Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asset Classes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits of Asset Allocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFA (Dimensional Fund Advisors)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous ETFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ETFs & Index Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial & Retirement Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How Wall Street Makes Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Index Funds Versus Mutual Funds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment Advisors and Wealth Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of Compound Returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malfeasance And Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Portfolio Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portfolio Diversification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebalancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Brokers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underperformance of Managers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanguard Funds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketriders/weblog/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous professors at Yale have proven that asset allocation accounts for 90% of a portfolio’s return and that stock picking and market timing account for less than 10%.   So what a great time to look at how different asset allocations are faring in this market!
In 2008 it turns out that asset allocation decisions have everything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The famous professors at Yale have proven that asset allocation accounts for 90% of a portfolio’s return and that stock picking and market timing account for less than 10%.   So what a great time to look at how different asset allocations are faring in this market!</p>
<p>In 2008 it turns out that asset allocation decisions have everything to do with a portfolio performance.</p>
<p>On <a href="http://www.marketriders.com/">MarketRiders</a>, we use our own ETF portfolio builder to track some “Celebrity Portfolios” including the “Lazy Portfolios” (published by Paul B. Farrell at Marketwatch). These portfolios mimic allocations based upon Yale University’s David Swensen, Dr. William Bernstein, Ted Aronson, and Bill Schulthesis who wrote “The Coffeehouse Investor.” Community members also have posted many interesting portfolios with unique asset allocations that have held up well in the last few months.</p>
<p>These portfolios use ETFs without active management and we track weighted average portfolio fees. The component ETF fees range from .08% to .50% and the weighted average portfolio fees are between .12% and .21%.</p>
<p>Comparing and contrasting portfolios with similar asset allocations, shows a lot about how to build solid “all weather” allocations that have held up even in 2008. While some of the variance is surely explained by the allocation in non-equities (Bonds, Treasury Inflation Protected Bonds and Cash), a lot of it is explained by the level of diversification amongst the other asset classes.</p>
<p><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></p>
<p>There’s quite a variance between some of the portfolios – even when their equity exposures are similar. Two portfolios each with 60% equity exposure have dramatically different results.</p>
<p>For example, Bill Schulthesis, a ex-Salomon Smith Barney broker who wrote <em>The Coffeehouse Investor</em>, designed a portfolio with 40% in an intermediate bond index (<a title="More opinion and analysis of BND" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/bnd">BND</a>) and 10% in each of 6 stock funds (Vanguad REIT ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VNQ" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vnq">VNQ</a>), SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of SPY" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/spy">SPY</a>), Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VB" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vb">VB</a>), Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VBR" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vbr">VBR</a>), Vanguard Value ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VTV" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vtv">VTV</a>), Vanguard FTSE All World ex-US ETF (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VEU" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/veu">VEU</a>)). Dr. William Bernstein wrote the &#8220;Intelligent Asset Allocator&#8221; and &#8220;The Four Pillars of Investing&#8221; and proposed the same basic allocation. But high exposure to small cap value US stocks and REITs allowed Coffeehouse’s returns to trump Bernstein by over 2 times.</p>
<p>Here are the results as of last night’s close.  These portfolios and the ETFs in them are posted on <a href="memberportfolios">MarketRiders</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt2.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt2_thumb1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The Best and the Worst Returns</strong></p>
<p>To better understand where the variances lie, we drill down into each asset class to see where returns (or lack thereof) are coming from. Aronson’s portfolio, is the worst so far, down (16.65%) with 80% equity exposure. Unfortunately, Aronson had no REIT exposure and heavy exposure to Emerging Market (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VWO" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vwo">VWO</a>) and Foreign Markets (European (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VGK" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vgk">VGK</a>) and Pacific (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VPL" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/vpl">VPL</a>)) which have both been crushed this year. Aronson’s portfolio has performed very well for 5 years on the backs of these asset classes, but 2008 has been his come-uppance.</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt3.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt3_thumb1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.marketriders.com/">MarketRiders</a> “Low Risk” portfolio is doing the best so far this year – down only (1.83%) – but with 25% exposure to equity and Real Estate (<a title="More opinion and analysis of RWR" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/rwr">RWR</a>). A strong US allocation (iShares S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Index  (<a title="More opinion and analysis of IJR" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/ijr">IJR</a>) and SPY) over Foreign Developed and Emerging Markets (<a title="More opinion and analysis of VEU" href="http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/veu">VEU</a>) helped dampen the losses.</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt4.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt4_thumb1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p><strong>It&#8217;s Time to Rebalance!</strong></p>
<p>Today, we’re rebalancing a few of these portfolios where actual allocations now vary greater than 20% off our targets. The most out of balance portfolio is the one built by John Spense and Rick Ferri on MarketWatch. Emerging Markets, Foreign Markets, TIPs and Small Cap US stocks are all out of whack so this portfolio and others will be brought back to their targets.</p>
<p><a href="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt5.jpg"><img src="http://static.seekingalpha.com/uploads/2008/9/25/saupload_mt5_thumb1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Stay tuned.  At the end of the year, we’ll report back and show you how these portfolios did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.marketriders.com/blog/tracking-9-etf-portfolios-surprise-winners-and-losers-so-far-in-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
